MICHELIN X^® LINE ENERGY D +

* Based on internal rolling resistance tests using ISO 28580 test method in tire size 275/80R22.5 LRG dual drive tire vs. the MICHELIN^® XDA^® ENERGY + tire. Actual on-road fuel saving results may vary, and may be impacted by many factors, to include road conditions, weather, environment, combination of steer and trailer tires used, driving habits, tire size, equipment and maintenance.

** Based on internal rolling resistance tests using ISO 28580 test method in tire size 275/80R22.5 LRG dual drive tire vs. the Bridgestone M710 Ecopia tire, Goodyear Fuel Max LHD G505D tire and Continental HDL2 tire in equivalent 295/75R22.5 LRG dimension. Actual on-road fuel saving results may vary, and may be impacted by many factors, to include road conditions, weather, environment, combination of steer and trailer tires used, driving habits, tire size, equipment and maintenance.

(1) Fuel savings calculated based on replacing the Bridgestone M710 Ecopia with the MICHELIN^® X^® LINE ENERGY D + in (8) drive tire positions on a class 8 tandem-drive axle truck. Calculations also based on the Canadian National average diesel fuel price as of September 3, 2019 of $1.184 per liter, for a class 8 tandem-drive axle truck and single tandem axle trailer combination travelling 120,000 kilometres/year. Actual results may vary, and may be impacted by many factors, to include road conditions, weather, environment, combination of steer and trailer tires used, driving habits, tire size, equipment and maintenance. Rolling resistance results based on internal ISO 28580 tests.

(2) Based on internal ISO 28580 rolling resistance testing using size 275/80R22.5 LRG.

(3) In a standardized starting snow test when tires are new, the 275/80R22.5 MICHELIN^® X^® LINE ENERGY D+ tire traveled 35% faster than the 295/75R22.5 Bridgestone^® M710 Ecopia tire, which are equivalent sizes. Actual on-road results may vary.